top of page

Relationship Between Trade and Poverty Globally


Introduction


Globalization, which began in 1870 and evolved through three distinct eras, has fostered increasing economic interdependence among nations through international trade. This openness significantly impacts national economies, yielding both positive and negative outcomes.


Positive Effects of Trade:

• Increased national income through specialization based on comparative advantage

• Access to global capital, technology, and expertise transfer

• Creation of job opportunities and economic growth


Negative Effects of Trade:

• Weakening of unskilled and less capitalized economies

• Exploitation of workers in developing countries

• Market instability and weakening of local industries (Agusalim, 2017)


The Ricardian Theory of Comparative Advantage highlights that trade liberalization enables countries to specialize based on their technological strengths and production capacity. This specialization reduces production costs and enhances competitiveness in global markets (Chau, 2022).


Consequently, international trade is often viewed as a key driver for poverty reduction. It promotes economic growth, increases national income, and creates employment opportunities. This perspective aligns with the United Nations’ call for developing countries to embrace open markets. Notably, estimates from the IMF (2001) suggest that global trade liberalization could generate $250–680 billion annually, with developing countries gaining proportionally more relative to their GDP due to reduced trade barriers.


Empirical Data Analysis


Graph 1.1

Based on World Bank data, a positive relationship exists between trade (measured through global goods exports) and poverty reduction (represented by world GDP per capita). As shown in graph 1.1., this relationship becomes particularly evident during economic disruptions:

1. 2007–2010 Financial Crisis: Global trade declined due to price instability and economic slowdown, leading to a parallel drop in GDP per capita.

2. 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic: Disruptions in supply chains and trade activities resulted in a similar decline in global GDP per capita.


This demonstrates the direct interplay between trade and economic growth, where external shocks to trade can adversely affect poverty reduction efforts.



References


Agusalim, L. (2017). Economic impacts of globalization. Retrieved from https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/3807/pdf


Chau, V. (2022). Trade liberalization and comparative advantage. Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1677582/FULLTEXT01.pdf


IMF. (2001). Global trade liberalization and poverty reduction. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ib/2001/110801.htm





Ahmed Bahaa Eldien Abdelgany Mohamed is an economist specializing in economic development, international trade, and public policy. With a Master’s experience in Development Economics, he holds a rich professional background, including roles as an Economic Policy Officer and an Economic Analyst. His work focuses on data-driven research, econometric analysis, and policy recommendations, with published studies addressing global trade, financial inclusion, and economic growth. Passionate about governance and sustainable development, and dedicated to fostering impactful solutions for pressing economic challenges.

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page